What's in a name?
In April, I had the good fortune to participate on panels with some wonderful people at
two events for Second Chance Month, as it had been designated by President Biden. At
one of the events, it was suggested that the better term is Fair Chance, because that
reflects that some people didn’t have a first chance, at least not a fair one. When I think
back to reviewing personal histories of defendants in presentence reports, there is no
question that a large segment of justice-system involved people never had a fair chance
to start with because of poverty, family instability, exposure to violence, adverse impacts
of drugs and alcohol, and frequently inter-generational trauma. These factors do not
excuse behavior, but they underlie and explain behavior. Instead of blaming and
shaming, we need to be more understanding if we are to have success in supporting
behavior change. So I agree that talking about a “Fair Chance” is important. Perhaps
the more important inadequacy of the name of our nonprofit or the designation “Second
Chance Month” is that it is not plural.
If you ever have the opportunity to participate in a
Reentry Simulation, it is a very valuable thing to do. The exercise is a role play that
takes about two hours and illustrates the pragmatic challenges and frustrations facing
people coming back to community. When I participate, I ended up back in “jail”, which
was a row of chairs in the middle of the conference room. When I got there, seated to
my left was Judge Bowman and to my right was Judge Soto. Most justice-system
involved people are going to need more than one chance to succeed, sometimes many
more than one. The importance of “fair chance” is retrospective; an acknowledgement
that many people who become burdened by criminal justice sanctions started with
significant disadvantages that in many instances are ongoing. The importance of
“second chances” is prospective; a recognition that the road to community reintegration
is not a smooth or easy one. We are not going to change the name of this organization,
but we intend to always be mindful that it is very understandable in most instances to
find we will need to, and want to, offer more than one “second chance.”
Comments